IND vs ZIM: Match Analysis: What led to the collapse of India's young guns on Harare's Spin-friendly track?

Against the odds in Harare, Zimbabwe made it their day by defeating India by 13 runs. Defending a modest total of 115, Zimbabwe displayed a convincing bowling performance. Despite the absence of any World Cup-winning Indian players in Harare, the Indian team was still expected to comfortably chase down the target. However, they never managed to gain momentum in their run chase. From the start, India found themselves on the back foot, with the innings commencing with ten consecutive dot balls.

Barring Ruturaj Gaikwad and Shubman Gill, the top six Indian batters fell prey to an overly aggressive approach early in the innings. Abhishek Sharma was the first to depart, miscuing a pull shot to the fielder at deep square leg. This reckless batting was in stark contrast to the cautious start required on a spin-friendly track. The early wickets put pressure on the Indian middle order, which struggled to stabilize the innings. The situation was ideally suited for batters like Gill and Gaikwad, who prefer to accelerate only after settling in and getting their eye in.

However, Gaikwad’s innings was cut short by his vulnerability to moving deliveries. He tentatively followed a ball that moved away late, leading to his dismissal. This further dented India’s chase, as they could not string together meaningful partnerships. The Indian batsmen’s inability to adapt to the pitch conditions and their eagerness to attack too soon cost them dearly. Consequently, Zimbabwe capitalized on these mistakes and successfully defended their total, sealing a remarkable victory.

See Also: INDW vs SAW: Player Analysis: Tazmin Brits Capitalizes on India’s Sloppy Performance

Why did India fell short of Expectations?

What led to the collapse of India's young guns on Harare's Spin-friendly track?#cricketlovers #INDvsZIM @BCCI @ZimCricketv #analysis pic.twitter.com/8g04R9473l

— Saiprasad Kagne (@KEVLAR2601) July 7, 2024

After a brief partnership, Dhruv Jurel attempted to replicate the drive that had earned him a boundary on the previous ball. Unfortunately, with the ball gripping the surface, his shot resulted in a straightforward catch for the fielder. Despite this setback, India remained hopeful with skipper Shubman Gill still at the crease, just one partnership away from a potential comeback. However, India’s inability to seize control of the match became evident when Sikandar Raza introduced himself into the attack in the 11th over.

Raza’s spell began with a loose delivery that went for four, but he quickly made amends by claiming the crucial wicket of Gill on the very next ball. In a manner reminiscent of Sunil Narine, Raza concealed the ball during his run-up and delivered a carrom ball. Gill, attempting to flick the ball to the leg side, overcommitted with his front foot, resulting in his dismissal. If not bowled by the deflection, Gill would have been trapped LBW. This pivotal wicket ensured Zimbabwe maintained their grip on the game, preventing India from mounting a successful chase.

At 86/9 in 17 overs, India needed 30 runs from the remaining 18 balls—a challenging yet achievable target. Washington Sundar was left to shoulder the responsibility alone. Despite a valiant effort that included a six, a wide, and a four to keep India in the contest, Zimbabwe maintained their composure. Sundar faced 16 of the final 18 deliveries but could only manage to score 14 runs. His struggle was apparent as he had a strike rate of 0 against balls on the stumps and just 14.3 against deliveries outside off-stump.

The Zimbabwean bowlers, Blessing Muzarabani and Tendai Chatara, executed their plan effectively by bowling good and back-of-a-length deliveries to Sundar, with fielders positioned at the boundaries square of the wicket. This strategy forced Sundar into a difficult position, where singles were not an option for the left-hander. As Sundar (27 off 34) tried to find his timing, he ended up rejecting several singles. Additionally, a couple of missed opportunities for twos further hampered India’s chase as Zimbabwe tightened their grip on the game with each passing ball.

With India needing 18 runs off the last two overs, Sundar could only muster four runs before becoming the last batter to fall on the penultimate ball of the innings. His efforts were not enough to bridge the gap, and Zimbabwe clinched a hard-fought victory, demonstrating their resolve and tactical acumen under pressure.

See Also: T20 WC 2024: Player Analysis: Why is Jasprit Bumrah so difficult to figure out?