Know the reason behind Irfan Pathan's disappointment over MS Dhoni - Cricket Winner

MS Dhoni refused a single or even a double despite having a power-hitter Daryl Mitchell at the other end of the pitch. This act of Dhoni was not appreciated by former all-rounder Irfan Pathan raised questions.

Know the reason behind Irfan Pathan's disappointment over MS Dhoni - Cricket Winner
Author Image
Sudhanshu

| May 2, 2024 at 6:08 PM

Be winner today!

Get the latest cricket updates, Join our community

iconiconicon
vector imagevector imagevector image

In a thrilling encounter in the ongoing Indian Premier League (IPL) 2024, the Punjab Kings emerged victorious against the Chennai Super Kings by 7 wickets at the MA Chidambaram Stadium on May 1, 2024.

Match Highlights and Key Moments

The match began with Punjab Kings winning the toss and opting to bowl first, setting the stage for an intense showdown. CSK’s opening batsmen, Ajinkya Rahane and skipper Ruturaj Gaikwad, laid a solid foundation with a promising start in the powerplay. However, the dismissal of Rahane for 29 runs in 24 balls by Harpreet Brar shifted the momentum in PBKS’s favour.

See Also: Canada announce squad for T20 World Cup

As the innings progressed, CSK encountered setbacks with the quick dismissals of Shivam Dube for a golden duck and Ravindra Jadeja scoring just 2 runs off 4 balls. Despite these challenges, Ruturaj Gaikwad’s resilient innings of 62 runs off 48 balls and Sameer Rizvi’s contribution of 21 runs off 23 balls propelled CSK to a total of 162/7 in their allotted 20 overs.

Analysis of MS Dhoni’s Refusal of Singles

MS Dhoni’s refusal of singles during his innings drew attention and criticism, particularly from former Indian all-rounder Irfan Pathan. Pathan disapproved of Dhoni’s actions, emphasizing the importance of teamwork in cricket.

In a way, Mitchell completed two runs while Dhoni refused to take a single run. This act of Dhoni was not appreciated by many and even former all-rounder Irfan Pathan raised questions on this in a chat at Star Sports. 

“He shouldn’t have done that (refusing a single). This is a team game. Don’t do that in a team game. The other guy is also an international player. If he had been a bowler, I would have understood it for sure. You have done that with (Ravindra) Jadeja and with Mitchell as well. You don’t need to do that. He could have avoided it,” Pathan added.

The reaction you know, but the reason you don’t  

This incident resembles Dhoni’s previous occurrence during the IPL 2016 match between Rising Pune Supergiants and Kolkata Knight Riders. In that match, Dhoni’s call for a single led to the run-out of Irfan Pathan, prompting similar scrutiny of Dhoni’s decision-making on the field.

The incident took place in the penultimate delivery of the 14th over, as Dhoni nudged a ball towards backward point and set off for a single. Pathan, on the other hand, took two steps before realising ball went straight into hands of Piyush Chawla and there was no single available. Dhoni by the time had reached half crease, and yelled ‘RUN’ at his partner in frustration. The hapless Pathan had to sacrifice his wicket in order to save his captain. Yet, such a gracious step from him wasn’t appreciated by Dhoni, who gave him a dirty look in his way back to pavilion.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Telegram Chennel cricketstatus7 (@telegramchennel_cricketstatus7)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Vishal kumar (@vishal.kumar_1818)

While some may attribute such incidents to miscommunication or misunderstanding, the refusal of singles reflects a disregard for the principles of sportsmanship and teamwork. In cricket, partnerships and collaborative efforts are integral to success; every run counts towards the team’s performance.

Tags:

Chennai Super KingsCSK Vs PBKSIrfan PathanMS DhoniPBKS vs CSK

Upcoming match

Latest News

It is not my job to announce the winner

Rohit Sharma on being asked if England were rightly awarded the World Cup title in 2019

logo

Copyright © 2024 Cricket Winner. All Rights Reserved.