T20 World Cup, SL vs SA: Sri Lanka register their lowest total in T20i against South Africa

T20 World Cup, SL vs SA: The Wanindu Hasaranga-led side was bundled out for 77 runs in 19.1 overs. Its previous lowest was 82 against India in 2016.

Author Image
Sudhanshu

Published Jun 3, 2024, 9:53 pm IST

3 mins read
T20 World Cup, SL vs SA: Sri Lanka register their lowest total in T20i against South Africa
Save
    Share on
    Instagram
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Telegram
    Copy

Be winner today!

Get the latest cricket updates, Join our community

iconiconicon
vector imagevector imagevector image

Sri Lanka’s ongoing clash with South Africa in New York during the T20 World Cup 2024 was a significant match, but it became notable for the wrong reasons. The Powerplay phase, crucial in setting the tone for the rest of the innings, saw Sri Lanka recording one of their joint-lowest scores in T20 World Cup history.

Sri Lanka’s Powerplay Woes

Sri Lanka won the toss and elected to bat first, a decision that quickly seemed questionable. South Africa’s bowlers were relentless, exploiting the conditions expertly.

See Also: Sanju Samson Reflects on His T20 World Cup 2024 Selection: A Decade of Setbacks

The Powerplay, where only two fielders are allowed outside the 30-yard circle, is designed to give batters a chance to score freely. However, Sri Lanka found themselves shackled, ending the first six overs at a dismal 24 for one. This score was tied with their previous low against New Zealand in the 2022 T20 World Cup, and only slightly better than their all-time lowest Powerplay score of 18 for three against India, also in 2022.

Key Moments

The early dismissal of opener Pathum Nissanka was a significant blow. Nissanka, trying to break the early pressure, holed out at third man after scoring just three runs off eight deliveries. Kamindu Mendis and Kusal Mendis managed to hit a boundary each, but the pressure from South Africa’s bowlers kept them from capitalizing further.

Sri Lanka’s Batting Struggles

Sri Lanka’s middle order failed to stabilize the innings after the Powerplay. Nortje and Maharaj continued to wreak havoc, with Sri Lankan batters falling to a mix of desperate slogs and poor shot choices. This collapse left the team in disarray, unable to build any substantial partnerships.

Despite the early setbacks, there were attempts by Sri Lanka’s middle order to recover. However, these were sporadic and ultimately insufficient. The lack of partnerships and frequent wickets prevented any significant resurgence.

The pitch in New York was slow and offered extra bounce, conditions that South Africa’s pacers exploited perfectly. The extra bounce and slight stickiness made shot-making difficult, forcing Sri Lankan batters into defensive postures and mistimed shots.

South Africa’s Bowling Dominance

South Africa’s bowlers were impeccable, starting with Ottniel Baartman, who made an immediate impact by dismissing Nissanka. Nortje’s figures of 4 for 7 highlighted his dominance, as he consistently troubled the batters with pace and bounce. Maharaj also played a crucial role, maintaining pressure with his spin.

Lowest totals by a Full member team in T20 WCs
55 Eng vs WI Dubai 2021
60 NZ vs SL Chattogram 2014
70 Ban vs NZ Kolkata 2016
72 Ban vs Aus Dubai 2021
77 SL vs SA New York 2024 *

Most economical 4-over spell in T20 WC
1.75 A Nortje vs SL New York 2024 *
2.00 A Mendis vs Zim Hambantota 2012
2.00 Mahmudullah vs Afg Mirpur 2014
2.00 W Hasaranga vs UAE Geelong 2022

It is also the lowest South Africa have bowled out an opponent in T20Is.

Lowest totals for SL in T20Is
77 vs SA New York 2024 *
82 vs Ind Vizag 2016
87 vs Aus Bridgetown 2010
87 vs Ind Cuttack 2017
91 vs Eng Southampton 2021

Tags:

ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024ICC Men’s T20 World CupSA vs SLSL vs SASouth AfricaSri LankaT20 World CupT20 World Cup 2024

UPCOMING MATCH

LATEST NEWS

It is not my job to announce the winner

Rohit Sharma on being asked if England were rightly awarded the World Cup title in 2019

logo

Copyright © 2024 Cricket Winner. All Rights Reserved.