As far as strategic decisions go, sidelining 1,177 Test wickets is up there with the boldest. Well ahead of wearing a blindfold in a dodgeball Englands match. And as Andrew Strauss, managing director of men’s cricket, for the time being, addressed the media at Lord’s on Wednesday, he was unequivocal in his view that dropping James Anderson and Stuart Broad for the tour of West Indies is the right thing to do. He reiterated this was the view held by the selection panel, which also featured stand-in head coach Paul Collingwood and head scout James Taylor.
And it was not for nothing that he went on record to state Joe Root, who was part of this long back and forth, did not have voting rights on this or other selection matters. The same England captain who at the end of the 4-0 Ashes defeat stated he wanted both out in the Caribbean with him. Let’s talk about strategy for a moment, specifically how it pertains to this situation. Because from the outside – and in – doing without two high-class performers, particularly Anderson who remains the team’s premier quick with 40 dismissals at 23 since the start of 2021, isn’t exactly conducive to improving on-field results when it’s needed most.
Nor is leaving the guidance and nous of 321 Tests at home while six fast bowlers (two of them debutants) with just 82 caps between them try and set about this reset in a region where only one (Mark Wood) has toured before. England has just one series win (2004) against West Indies in their last 10 visits. It is, in essence, solely about creating a void that, for three Tests at least, must be filled. Chris Woakes simply has to show much more than his overseas average of 52.38 and may make a better fist of doing so with an undisputed role with the new ball.
Wood must maintain his exemplary form during the Ashes, and not just feel hard done by not to get wickets. Similarly, the newbies, whether Saqid Mahmood or Matt Fisher, with a clearer route into the XI, need to hit the ground running if they get a chance. Anything less and England will leave with the Caribbean with a third successive series defeat. Most importantly for Strauss, it seems, is the omission of Anderson and Broad forces the team to find influence from other sources. “What I do think is it gives an opportunity at the moment for people to stand up and play leadership roles they haven’t previously,” said Strauss. “We need a good solid spine to that team moving forward.
We need leaders, not just the captain, and this provides an opportunity for some of the players to do that.” Now, this is where it gets interesting, even a little suggestive. Strauss dismissed the idea of either obstructing other voices, or that their personalities were too dominant for others to prosper. Were they too strong for Root to handle? Again, another rebuttal: “If that had been the case they would not have played for all these years. I don’t believe that to be the case.” That is certainly true of the wider bowling group. Out in Australia, Anderson and Broad were willing to impart their expertise when sidelined and encouraged others to speak their thoughts when playing.
They have also been particularly forthcoming in sharing the skills that make them unique and, until now, undroppable. With regards to the team, things are not quite so straightforward. The pair have a certain intimidation factor because of their longevity and personas. Their voices carry a little more weight, their words – and particularly their criticisms – pack a punch. And the prevalence of those words – both have prominent media presences already – is something certain teammates find difficult to square. Behind the scenes in Australia, the honest conversations over repeat poor performance ended up feeling like a batters-vs-bowlers stand-off.